{"id":26830,"date":"2026-04-03T03:00:11","date_gmt":"2026-04-03T07:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stingfm.com\/news\/serious-risk-of-poisoning-the-jury-in-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-former-lawyer-to-rt\/"},"modified":"2026-04-03T03:00:11","modified_gmt":"2026-04-03T07:00:11","slug":"serious-risk-of-poisoning-the-jury-in-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-former-lawyer-to-rt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.stingfm.com\/news\/serious-risk-of-poisoning-the-jury-in-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-former-lawyer-to-rt\/","title":{"rendered":"Serious risk of \u2018poisoning the jury\u2019 in Charlie Kirk murder trial \u2013 former lawyer to RT"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Inaccurate reporting feeds into various conspiracy theories about the activist\u2019s killing, David Freiheit has said<\/strong><\/p>\n

Inaccurate media reporting on the latest statements by the defense team in Charlie Kirk\u2019s murder case shows that there is a real risk of \u201cpoisoning the jury\u201d<\/em> and affecting the trial, former lawyer and a legal commentator David Freiheit has told RT.<\/p>\n

Earlier this week, several outlets reported, citing the lawyers representing Tyler Robinson \u2013 the man accused of killing Kirk \u2013 that the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) could not conclusively connect a bullet fragment recovered from Kirk\u2019s body to a rifle found at the scene.<\/p>\n

According to Freiheit, some of those reports, such as the one by the Daily Mail, were inaccurate. \u201cThe headline was overtly misleading,\u201d<\/em> he said, adding that the British media outlet said \u201cit did not match, whereas in reality\u2026 the ATF or the reports [said] that they couldn’t match it based on the fragments, which is not uncommon in these types of incidents.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n
Charlie Kirk bullet doesn\u2019t match suspect\u2019s rifle \u2013 lawyers<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The former lawyer believes that the defense team would try to \u201cirritate anybody who believes that the defendant is guilty,\u201d<\/em> as well as to exclude any damning evidence that could indicate their client is guilty. \u201cThey are also trying to exclude camera [footage] from the courtroom, which would be an abject disaster given the national and international importance of this case,\u201d<\/em> Freiheit said.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere’s a real concern in this particular case about what they call poisoning the jury,\u201d<\/em> the former lawyer stated, adding that information provided to the media, whether it is accurate or not, could \u201cferment\u2026 conspiracy theories\u201d<\/em> and eventually affect the trial.<\/p>\n

Freiheit also stated that some questions surrounding the murder do need to be answered. The list of such issues includes a possibility of other people on social media possessing \u201cadvance knowledge\u201d<\/em> about the attack and the reasons for a \u201clapse\u201d<\/em> in the campus security that allegedly allowed the suspected assassin to take up a position on an unguarded roof, according the former lawyer.<\/p>\n

Watch the full interview here:<\/p>\n